Saturday, September 01, 2012

"Michael Moore Predicts 'President Romney' in November"

I think people should start to practice the words "President Romney."

What's Thicko up to these days? I mean, besides 350 pounds. What I mean to say is, What does leftist filmmaker Michael Moore think of the current presidential campaign? And what do his loyal followers, the denizens of the DUmp, make of Mike's take? Let's find out, shall we? To do so, we go to this THREAD, "Michael Moore: Romney will win in November," and this THREAD, "Michael Moore Predicts 'President Romney' in November."

So now let us see if the DUmmies still like Mike, in Bowling-for-Bolshevik Red, while the commentary of your humble guest correspondent, Charles Henrickson, thinking Big Mike should start to practice the words "Ramen Noodles," is in the [brackets]:

Michael Moore: Romney will win in November

[Is Michael Moore bucking for a Kewpie Doll? Sorry, Mike, only registered DUmmies are eligible. And you must produce a photo ID.]

"To assume that the other side are just a bunch of ignoramuses who are supported by people who believe that Adam and Eve rode on dinosaurs 6,000 years ago is to completely misjudge the opposition."

[The ignoramuses would be those who believe that this world happened by chance and that man evolved from monkeys. Although, having seen the Occupy crowd, I may have to re-think that last part.]

Moore said he believes that if the election were conducted "American Idol"-style, and Americans were able to vote from their couches, Obama "would win hands down."

[The Sanjaya Effect. Did you hear that, Democrats? If you want Barack to win, take to your couches on November 6! Text in your vote! Or call, troll-free, 1-800-NICE-GUY. You can do it!]

[More from Moore . . .]

Michael Moore Predicts 'President Romney' in November

[I predict "Prescient Moore."]

"Mitt Romney is going to raise more money than Barack Obama. That should guarantee his victory."

["If you've got a victory, you didn't win that. Somebody's money made that happen."]

"I think people should start to practice the words 'President Romney.'"

[I agree, Mike, they should. OK, you there at MSDNC--yes, you Butch Maddow, and you, Lawrence of Insania--all of you, all together now: "Pre-si-dent Rom-ney." Good! Come on, Ed, you can do it! "President Romney." That's it, "Rom-ney." Practice, people, practice!]

[The DUmmies respond . . .]

I don't think that there's any reason to be sanguine, considering the things that are going on in Michigan, and Florida and Ohio. There is blatant vote-rigging going on. . . .

[The standard excuses for losing are being prepared.]

I respect Michael Moore. But he's being very defeatist.

[Michael Moore hasn't seen his feet since 1992. That's why he's de-feetist.]

I like him an all, but he whines too much. . . .

more and more people are beginning to notice that the Republicans have little to run on. . . .
[Maybe Moore is one of the people beginning to notice that Obama has NOTHING to run on.]

instead of curling up into a little ball and say "Oh poor pitiful me. Oh poor pitiful me. Oh poor pitiful me."

[Are you suggesting that Michael Moore is curling up into a little ball? How is that possible?]

There has already been a GOTV trial run for November. It happened in June during the WI recalls. OFA and many other national orgs were here.

[So a big effort. Let's see, and how did that go? I don't recall.]

Romney will need solutions for the debates. He's going to get his ass handed to him by President Obama. . . .

[How will the Teleprompter-in-Chief explain six trillion in new debt? . . . Anyone? . . . Anyone?]

and that little weasel, Ryan, will look like he has no business in the same room with VP Biden.

[Agreed. Uncle Joe will look like he belongs in a room with padded walls.]

I need a stiff drink with some herbs and spices.

[If you have enough alcohol and "herbs" and "spices," then who cares who wins or loses? Yeah, that's the ticket! C'mon, DUmmies, stock up on those herbs and spices!]

Once more Michael Moore is talking out of his ass.

[I think you're mistaking his face for his ass, which, I admit, is easily done.]

Moore wants Rmoney to win so he cam make more half-fictional movies about right-wingers.

[Hee! Hee! You may have something there. The only movie Mike has made since Obama won bombed big-time. Maybe he needs an eeevil villain to play against.]

Why do people keep saying that Michael Moore lies?

[Because he opens his mouth?]

OH MIKE!!! PLEASE you have been stuffing your fat face so much it's effecting your brain.

[Between lying and stuffing his fat face, Mike's mouth is always open.]

If I stuff my face I can effect my brain? I can bring about my brain by eating? This poses an interesting conundrum: if I don't have a brain, how can I eat? A brain is required to operate my ingestion mechanisms (jaw, salivary glands, swallow thingy), is it not? Yet you say a person can bring his or her brain into existence merely by stuffing his or her face.

[If you don't have a brain, how can you post? Yet it's done all the time in DUmmieland. Very affectively, I might add.]

MM just made my ignore list from now on.

[Oh, and no, that is NOT Nadin Brzezinski saying that.]

he is NOT making a definite prediction that Romney will win. He's saying that without enough excitement, enough turnout, by Dem voters and activists, Romney will win.

[In other words, he's saying that Romney will win.]

too many of us are 'meh'. . . .

[The thrill is gone. Obamassiah has become plain old Oba . . . meh.]

MM presented some excellent points. We don't have the fire in our belly. . . .

[MM has a vat of Häagen-Dazs in his belly.]

the more i listen to moore, the less i respect him.

[Less is Moore.]

He is an opinionated blob with limited insight, grand self interest and a borderline bully.

[A borderline bully with a boulder-size belly.]

This is so F***ED-UP it means one thing. The. Deal. Is. Done.

[So. Give. Up. Now.]

We don't need this right now, especially not from Michael Moore. He is depressing turnout. . . .

[I think Mike could depress Milwaukee if he sat on it.]

MM is a very charismatic figure. . . .

[I think the word you're looking for there is "aromatic."]

Go eat another hamburger Mike and STFU. . . .

[STUFF, then STFU.]

Yes, Romney might win. But that is no reason to quit.

[Oh, sure it is! Think of the herbs and spices!]

Lets not forget the Diebold voting machines.

[More herbs and spices, please!]

He has to be wrong, because if he isn't, we are going to go live in Great Britain where my husband's family are. I couldn't bear it.

[But they have the NHS there! Life is wonderful! Indeed, all you DUmmies could get on a boat--let's call it the Maydayflower--and sail back to the old country. Mike can provide the ballast. Alec Baldwin could play the captain. Put Roseanne Barr on the ship's bow. Let's sing! "Sailing, sailing. . . ."]

He is warning dems not to be so cocky. . . .

[Because the Rethugs are so Kochy.]

Michael Moore can go f*** himself.

[Actually, I don't think he can.]

And get the f*** out of the way. . . .

[Actually, I don't think he can.]

under the bus with him.

[See above.]

so yeah, under the bus with him, and back over his ass a few times. . . . F*** him and the Cadillac he rode in on.  . . . F*** MM. . . . Screw MM and his stupid little ballcap. He can go dance off with his buddy Ralph Nader and they can go spoil someone else's fun. . . . He's a f***ing loser-scold. He hauled his ass up and jumped that shark. . . . So f*** Michael Moore.  I don't give a sh*t what he has to say. . . .  he is just a loudmouth doom-and-gloom whiner looking for self-aggrandizing publicity in a beat up ball cap. . . . I have no time for people who whine, cry and say "Waaaaaaah, the Democrats are going to LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSE."  F*** Michael Moore. . . . So f*** Michael Moore. 

[Not a fan, eh, DUmmie MADem?]


Blogger 98ZJUSMC said...

Sorry. I'm laughing too hard to post anything incisive.

1:34 AM  
Blogger Ogrrre said...

DUmbasses are either delusional, brain injured, or stoned on some really bad shit if they think the Rs "don't have much to run on", or that Obama can win a debate with Romney, or ESPECIALLY if they think Biden will (or even can) win a debate with Ryan.
Republicans don't have much to run on? I suppose the economy, Obamacare, the economy, tranparency, the economy, Obama's lies, the economy, Obama's communist stooge appointees, Obama's handling of the economy, and the mis-administration's criminality isn't much.

9:11 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Obama will be forced to defend the indefensible.

Adding to Ogrrre's list, include:
-Solyndra and the host of other "green" failed moneyholes
-Raping Medicare for $716 billion
-Fast & Furious
-Eric Holder in general
-the WORST recovery in history
-Jobs, jobs, jobs
-Gas prices
and let us not overlook...

The downgrade of America's credit rating from AAA to AA+. A criminal shame, and one I will never forgive that jugeared putz for.

3:41 PM  
Anonymous Corona said...

It's easy. Just substitute Bushs' name with Michael Moores'. Tada, instant DUmmie rant.

And Slow Joes' debate with Ryan will be better than 10 Superbowls.

3:47 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

• Unemployment: 7.8% then, 8.3% now
• Median income: $54,983 then, $50,964 now
• Gas prices: $1.85 per gallon then, $3.78 now
• National debt: $10.6 trillion then, $15.9 trillion now

Expect Mitt Romney to memorize these statistics, and perhaps toss in the civilian participation rate, which was at 65.7% in January 2009 and in June 2009 at the start of the “recovery,” but fell to a 30-year low of 63.6% in April and is at 63.7% now.

4:32 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Am I the only one who's going to laugh about the fact that the DUmmies apparently haven't successfully managed 7th-grade Englis, i.e., "effect" vs "affect"?
Were I a libtard, I'd need a hug. As it is, I can only shake my head.
--Tennessee Budd

12:57 AM  
Blogger Syntheto said...

The ignoramuses would be those who believe that this world happened by chance and that man evolved from monkeys.

I love the site and will continue to come here. However, please don't confuse conservative values with being anti-science, or associated with religious fundamentalism. I'm an atheist. I don't consider myself an 'ignoramus' for giving the nod to the theory of evolutionary biological adaptation over nearly inconceivable amounts of time, rather than to chalking it all up to direct intervention by supernatural means.
While I'm at it, to all the DU lurkers here, don't you make the mistake of thinking that because someone is pro-scientific method that they can't possibly identify themselves as conservatives. Furthermore, I reject the only litmus test that the left trots out these days: that of the veracity of the theory of human-caused climate chaos.
Newsflash: Whatever the causes, any sort of actual harmful climate change would be a global problem, which would require a global solution, which in turn would require a global government. That's not going to happen any time soon, so the point is moot.

7:41 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home