Thursday, August 14, 2008

DNC-ing with the Tasers: "Denver's Little GITMO ready to go!"



"End the war now!" "The whole world is watching!" "Days of Resistance!" Are we time-traveling back to 1968? No, it's 2008, but there's a group trying to RECREATE '68. They want the Democrats in Denver to enjoy the same rioting and mayhem Chicago experienced forty years ago. (Yours truly was a teenager in Chicago at the time--a conservative Republican teenager--and I remember the hippies and the Yippies and the flippies invading our fair city.)

Knowing this group's announced intentions, the city of Denver and the Democrat National Convention therefore are preparing for any trouble that may occur. That means extra security, plans to deal with rioters, places to put possible arrestees, etc. But the KOmmies see these preparations as forebodings of a police-state lockdown, as evidenced in this
THREAD, "Holding pens and Tasers: Denver's Little GITMO ready to go!"

NEEDS MORE POPCORN! Forget cowbell, pass the popcorn! This Donnybrook in Denver should be sheer entertainment! We'll go from beach volleyball in Beijing to synchronized sit-ins (or sh*t-ins?) in Denver. So let's survey the KOnsternations of the KOmmies, in Bolshevik Red, while the commentary of your humble guest correspondent, Charles Henrickson, wanting to recreate '08--1908, the last time the Cubs won the World Series--is in the [brackets]:

Holding pens and Tasers . . .

[How do you hold pens and Tasers at the same time? Seems a little awkward to me.]

Denver's Little GITMO ready to go!

[Cue Ronnie and the Daytonas for a remake of "Little GTO."]

The Democrats and the Po-lice are ready for terrorism protests in Denver.

[Protests Riots.]

"Barbed wire, stun-gun use mark DNC warehouse jail". . . . When the reports say "stun guns" they mean "tasers".

[DNC-ing with the Tasers.]

I hope this becomes an embarrassing spectacle for the Democratic Party wunderkind who thought this was a good idea. . . .

[Hey, I hope the WHOLE THING, inside and out, becomes an embarrassing spectacle for the Democrat Party! Pass the popcorn!]

What if they threw a convention and nobody came?

[Please come to Denver . . . and bring some feces to throw!]

someone might intentionally try to create the impression that this is being done by Howard Dean's DNC in order to stir up ill will in Left Blogistan.

["And we're going to South Dakota and Oregon and Denver and Left Blogistan! YEEEEAAARRRGGGHHH!!!!!"]

hmm might there be some people in Colorado with an interest in making Ds look bad?

[No, you guys are quite capable of looking bad all on your own.]

We saw a similar dynamic when the National Conferrence of Mayors held their Convention here in Madison in 2002, complete with the same stories about protesters planning to hurl bags of sh*t at cops.

[No sh*t?]

I wouldn't put it past some Young Republicans to pretend to be "liberal" protesters in order to cause trouble and make us all look like raving loons.

[That's where the Guy Fawkes masks come in. . . .]

2000 DemCon in LA. I sensed that the biggest impetus to the Police Riot was the decision to deploy officers for 12 hour shifts in black riot gear on blacktop parking lots in the LA sun. The heat drove 'em batty.

[That explains what happened to Will Pitt with that black Midnight Cowboy outfit in the hot Texas sun.]

Why dosen't Obama do something about this? It's his party. Can't he call off the dogs or something?

[Throw the dogs under the bus!]

Don't taze me, Bro!!

[Go krazy, KOmmie!!]

They'll tase the sh*t out of you.

[You'll have nothing left to hurl.]

Lets us Dems move the Convention

[Hold it in Canada!]

Rs are probably going to dress up as Democrats and protest at their own convention.

[What would "dressing up as Democrats" look like? Nose rings? Tattoos? Purple hair?]

Dean's not behind it but he's not stepping up.

[The doctor is OUT.]

I remember John Kerry EXPRESSLY wished to deter protest back in 2004 - the antiwar crowd was plainly snubbed.

[John Kerry had their back.]

Is this to contain a Hillary Protest?

[The Million Menopause March.]

No. Anarchkids, Code pink, Me. I'm bringing a huge "STOP GOVERNMENT SPYING" banner. . . .

[STOP ANARCHKID SPYDERS!]

I love code pink.

[I like pina coladas.]

The Feds are playing the Denver coips for chumps, fabricating plpots to hurl bagsd of feces at officers. . . .

[They're just being fecetious.]

If the City wants a peraceful week providing a campsite is key.

[Get Cindy Sheehan to organize Camp Crazy.]

American Concentration Camps. This has been in the works for years.

[Do they ever let you into the LOWER LEVELS of the Wal-Marts? No? Ever wonder why? Think about it.]

no one who really cares about the D party or electing Obama president will try to re-create Chicago 68.

[They'll just do it anyway! Hee! Hee!]

I don't blame the powers that be for having a contingency plan in place.

[LOUSY FREEPER/FBI TROLL!]

Everyone who goes to Denver to speak their mind is going to face the hostility of the local business establishment and the wrath of the Democrat aparat for daring to be a skunk at their garden party. They are going there facing the real possibility of brutal arrests, hellish confinement, and even death. . . Anyone who gets involved in these protests, either as a participant or as a bystander, is a hero.

[Hero skunkumus.]

What I hope is that people have CAMERAS at the ready to take photos of the 'intigators' of ANY protests that might occur.

[I hear a certain female videographer is available these days.]

NO ARRESTS AT THE DNC.

[RECREATE '68 AT THE DNC.]

As I sit drinking my Starbucks I recall the comments that Violence Against Private Property is Not Violence, rather it is liberating the commons from the bourgoise.

[It's just Venti-ing one's frustration.]

if it turns into a clusterf*ck I will not be voting for Obama.

Stop that. Every change in the wind, people are going on about "not Voting for Obama". He has nothing to do with this, though it would be super-cool if he said "Let my people protest".


[Black Moses, coming down from the Baracky Mountain: "Let my people throw . . . feces!"]

The ranting about loss of freedom before a single person has even been arrested strikes me as chicken little-ish.

[Congratulations! You get today's Kewpie Doll for a brief moment of mental clarity.]

37 Comments:

Anonymous Corona said...

I bet not even 2% of all DUmmies even show up at the convention. They know that their hardcore heroes 'the anarchists' (who have no time for writing rants on a blog) are a little too unpredictable concerning the safety of anyone around them, friend or foe.

No, they'll be reporting live at the DNC convention from their basements.

11:41 AM  
Blogger Tazzerman said...

"As I sit drinking my Starbucks I recall the comments that Violence Against Private Property is Not Violence, rather it is liberating the commons from the bourgoise."

Ah a true deciple of political theorists Michael Hardt and Toni Negri. (Not to mention Karl baby!)

Here's a tidbit of where THEY come from:

"One should give weight to the terms “global citizenship” and “common concern.” Doesn’t this desire to establish a global political organization and engagement that will neutralize and channel market forces mean that we are in need of a properly communist perspective? The need to protect the “commons” justifies the resuscitation of the notion of Communism: It enables us to see the ongoing “enclosure” of our commons as a process of proletarization of those who are thereby excluded from their own substance."

Sound familiar folks? Include the words Environmental and/or Global Warming in there and you'll see what I mean.

That should send shivers up the spine of any person who believes in freedom, liberty and individual/private property rights.

And THIS my friends is exactly what the left means to take away from ALL of us.

I saw this crap back in the 60's and I see again today. Marxs and communisim is NOT dead! It's just underground, working it's 'magic' though an uninformed and ill educated group of people, just like always..

What's truly frightening is that for the most part, the members of places like DU and DKOS are clueless to it. They actually embrace it and if you listen to them carefully when they say things like 'our values' you'll hear it regurgitated...

It IS interesting that every once and a while, like right here, one of the 'inteligenzia' actually SLIPS and you see their true intentions.

Unfortunately, the DUmmies have no idea that they are being made into 'useful idiots' by their own 'fellow travelers'...

11:46 AM  
Anonymous kayinmaine said...

Bush and *spit* McCain had Russia invade Georgia to help the Neocons take total power!

Barack is all that stands between a World Communitee and neocon facist domination OF THE WHOLE WORLD!!!!!

12:09 PM  
Blogger Son Of The Godfather said...

"Anyone who gets involved in these protests, either as a participant or as a bystander, is a hero."

Ah, now we discover what a DUmmie "hero" is... a bystander at a protest.

"FREEEEEEEEEEEDOOOOOOOM!!!"

2:21 PM  
Anonymous dutch508 said...

Hows does that work, Kaye? The whole Russia invades Georgia thing? How does it make a neo-con power play easier?

5:32 PM  
Anonymous the-gunslinger said...

I just realized that the problem with the Moonbats is that they have no imagination!

They simply can't "imagine" the ultimate results of the policies they support. They are incapable of following an argument or proposal to its logical conclusion.

That is why there are so many "unintended consequences" that result from so many Liberal programs.

They seem incapable of "picturing" the damage they will do to their own party, and to Obie if they persist in acting like fools in Denver.

No imagination..

6:28 PM  
Anonymous Ray said...

I wonder why the DUmmies all want to riot, I mean protest, the DEMOCRATIC convention in Denver? If they REALLY believe that conservatives are the enemy, wouldn't they riot, I mean protest, in St. Paul?

What I DON'T wonder about is the fact that NOBODY worries about a "neocon fascist" riot comprised of Republican supporters. You would think that, since they are all supposedly "fascists," it would be the "neocons" who would run around smashing windows, burning cars in the street, and generally causing trouble for everyone. Isn't that right, Trog and Kay? But, no, it's always the "Progressives" that end up rioting. Care to explain why this is, Trog and Kay?

7:33 PM  
Anonymous Shambhala said...

As I sit drinking my Starbucks I recall the comments that Violence Against Private Property is Not Violence, rather it is liberating the commons from the bourgoise.


There is just so much stupidity in that sentence it's impossible to comprehend.

yes, this asshole will be among the first against the Wall after La Revolucion.

9:01 PM  
Anonymous troglaman said...

"St. Paul police say they will achieve their goal of having almost 3,500 officers available during the Republican National Convention in September, but they won't say how many they have now."

"St. Paul Police Federation head Dave Titus also said he believed the department would achieve its goal of having 3,500 officers in place, though he called the number at the "low end" of what is safe for an event of this size. Titus said he would have preferred a force of 6,000."

"That's a number where we know we can handle anything that's thrown at us," Titus said, adding that everyone is concerned about safety during the event."

"That has apparently proven more difficult than police hoped, though they insist they will have enough commitments in place by the time 45,000 delegates and media members, along with potentially TENS OF THOUSANDS PROTESTERS."

"The sheriff's office will handle detainees and contribute officers to the event."

http://www.twincities.com/politics/ci_10097930?source=rss

Security. A fact of life these days, don't ya think?

"I wonder why the DUmmies all want to riot, I mean protest, the DEMOCRATIC convention in Denver? If they REALLY believe that conservatives are the enemy, wouldn't they riot, I mean protest, in St. Paul?" just ray

OK, ray. I'm marking you down as predicting riots in Denver. Care to make a little wager, my friend?

If there are riots, I'll admit I'm a satanist who eats newborn babies alive. If there are no riots, you must proclaim yourself a troglamatic dumbass. You in?

2:20 AM  
Anonymous troglaman said...

"You would think that, since they are all supposedly "fascists," it would be the "neocons" who would run around smashing windows, burning cars in the street, and generally causing trouble for everyone. Isn't that right, Trog and Kay?" ray making an ass out of himself

Who did the bomb at the Atlanta Olympics? Who did Oklahoma City? Smashing windows and burning cars is one thing...your buddies take it to another level.

2:39 AM  
Anonymous troglaman said...

Oh. I forgot one, ray. Who did the anthrax thing?

2:58 AM  
Anonymous Anon 1:50 said...

It may have been overlooked by the hordes who have protest-sign-shaped axes to grind, that this is Denver...not Chicago.

Western cops aren't wussified, can use horses effectively for crowd control, have hated hippies since Moses was in a basket. Further, anyone using "Violence Against Private Property is Not Violence", as a defense is going to find themselves cattle-prodded (in use LONG before tazers), into a urine-soaked ball and dumped into a cage.

And, of some small moment, has anyone heard of laying on thousands of extra judges, public defenders and the like? No?

Well! How long do you think it will take to process the unruly, stunned, pissballs?

I'm betting 3 days...

Go to it DUmmies! They're ready for you, and will roll up your violence quicker than you can roll a joint!

5:50 AM  
Anonymous John Galt said...

"Oh. I forgot one, ray. Who did the anthrax thing?" - t-man

I don't think they've answered that question fully yet.

9:09 AM  
Anonymous John Galt said...

The National Socialist Workers Party (Nazi Party) is big in Minnesota. They've been staging immigration demonstrations allover the midwest and they show up in busloads. Costs a freakin fortune to provide police protection for the assholes. Wouldn't surprise me if they showed up at the Republican Convention, home turf (Minnesota) and all that.

9:14 AM  
Anonymous Ray said...

"OK, ray. I'm marking you down as predicting riots in Denver. Care to make a little wager, my friend?"


Sure, I'm in. Having police around isn't going to prevent a riot. The police were around in '68 but that prevented jack shit. The same with the riots in Seattle. Having an increased police presence is more likely to add to the liberal riot itch then to prevent one. After all, when is th last time you seen a liberal "protester" RESPECT the police during a "protest?" They LIVE for arrests and "civil disobedience."

I bet that liberals will try to cause a ruckus in Denver and will get their commie asses tazed on National TV. More and more incidences will occur, more and more liberals will rush to the defense of their comrades, and the News will show more and more "live" views of the "riot (you know they'll will call it that) until there is a REAL full blown riot occurring where windows will get smashed, car will get burned, and hundreds of people will get forced out of the streets.

The same with St.Paul, which is right across the river from Minneapolis where I live. But, unlike Denver, the "riots" will be sporadic at best and will be quickly broken up and the crowd dispersed..

The wager is one of honor, where you must admit you're wrong something I've yet to see you do (Edwards and the National Enquirer comes to mind). How about it, are you in?

10:36 AM  
Anonymous Ray said...

"Oh. I forgot one, ray. Who did the anthrax thing?"

What the hell does that have to do with Denver and riots? Take your red herring and smoke it. Apple wood works best, IMHO.

10:41 AM  
Anonymous Ray said...

"Who did the bomb at the Atlanta Olympics? Who did Oklahoma City? Smashing windows and burning cars is one thing...your buddies take it to another level."

My buddies? No, more of your red herrings.

10:45 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The luscious irony of those heady days of 1968 is that the Democrats lost credibility with the nation and Nixon was elected. Not Humphrey.

Why do the lefty Anarchists look back on 1968 as "the good times"?

But then again, the revisionists will remind us that Nixon had done dirty tricks, in '68. Oh, and they love to call Vietnam, "Nixon's War".

Wait for the resurrection of the Hildabeast! We ain't seen NUTHIN', yet!!!!

1:11 PM  
Anonymous elrond hubbard said...

Oh, I forgot one ray. Who did the anthrax thing?

Need you ask t-square. Of course it was Rove. Or, if not Rove, then Cheney, shooting librul Dems with anthrax soaked birdshot.

8:32 PM  
Anonymous troglaman said...

"Further, anyone using "Violence Against Private Property is Not Violence", as a defense is going to find themselves cattle-prodded (in use LONG before tazers), into a urine-soaked ball and dumped into a cage." anon

Right on bro. Way to break it down.

You are all aware, I hope, that this is slowly becoming your face. Flattering. No really, it is.

12:56 AM  
Anonymous troglaman said...

"Need you ask t-square. Of course it was Rove. Or, if not Rove, then Cheney, shooting librul Dems with anthrax soaked birdshot." elrond

Actually elrond, according to the FBI, it was a Catholic white guy. Bruce Ivins.

"Ivins had helped the FBI investigate an anthrax-tainted envelope sent to a US senator’s Washington office, as a microbiologist for a government laboratory. For the past 18 years, Ivins worked at the government’s elite biodefense research laboratories at Fort Detrick, Md. He had played a central role in research to improve anthrax vaccine by preparing anthrax formulations used in experiments on animals."
http://www.local12.com/news/local/story.aspx?content_id=df11877a-0fd4-4fcc-b515-b107c0fbd0f0&rss=30

We are talking now, as you well know my wingnut friends, about an obvious Muslim implant disguised as a Catholic. And, of all things, a white microbiologist to boot. The perfect disguise.

"The Fort Detrick laboratory and its specialized scientists for years have been at the center of the FBI's investigation of the anthrax mailings."

So it's not Rove or Cheney. Damn.

1:40 AM  
Anonymous troglaman said...

"Why do the lefty Anarchists look back on 1968 as "the good times"?" anon

Right. Both MLK and RFK assasinations. Super good year. Chicago convention. You wouldn't have any links referencing "the good times" would you? Cause it was actually a pretty shitty year when you think about it. Not that you would, of course.

Wait a minute...maybe it's you, anon, that somehow thinks upon '68 as "the good times". You came up with with the whole leftist anarchist, "68 ROCKS" concept and everything.

Could it be that this is simply a product of your own twisted mind?

2:48 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Why do the lefty Anarchists look back on 1968 as "the good times"?" anon


Becasue they still think that the reactionary left was actually going to take over and start up the American Gulag, for real.

Ooops.

2:38 PM  
Anonymous elrond hubbatd said...

t-man,

If the screwball Left doesn't think that 1968 was "the good times" why do we have "Recreate '68". with its retro slogan "The whole world is watching"?

1968 was shitty for lots of people, including me, but the Left thrived on the misery and chaos---Chicago, Days of Rage, assassinations, etc. The left wing nose dive into
the abyss of it's own making began in '68---and they loved it.

P.S. no one on the Left believes it was poor, hapless Ivens; just ask keyinmaine, she'll set you straight.

4:43 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

yochanan of lgf

go for it anarchist swine a good riot will only help the GOP.

JOE HILL got what he deserved
FRY MUMIA

3:06 PM  
Anonymous susieq2cute said...

Rumor has it that the tman is appearing in Denver wearing a giant paper mache head of arugula.

6:06 PM  
Anonymous troglaman said...

"Rumor has it that the tman is appearing in Denver wearing a giant paper mache head of arugula." susie

So? I heard you were heading to Minn as Sidney's ex-wife. Shit. No. It was his future wife. Wasn't it? Christ. I can't remember.

Never the less, I'll gladly take the "Arugula Head". You're a brave woman.

And to all of you maniacs predicting the total sacking of Denver (and/or partial sacking of Minn) by surging mobs of moonbat anarchists chanting "The whole world is watching"...what can I say? Just 'cause you're paranoid doesn't mean that someone isn't out to smash your windows and burn your cars. We'll see. Bar fights and domestic disputes don't count (lucky you).

"The wager is one of honor, where you must admit you're wrong something I've yet to see you do (Edwards and the National Enquirer comes to mind). How about it, are you in?" ray waving a small american flag (if you know what I mean)

"The wager is one of honor". No, it's not. I have nothing to do with your honor and you have nothing to do with mine. That you can conceive such a thing means either:

(A) Trading quips in a quiet little conservative cyber-street will actually involve matters of honor, or;

(B) You're full of grade A bullshit, ray.

**DING** You're right! B!

You and I both know our little wager has nothing to do with 'honor', you dumbass. Or should I say 'troglamatic dumbass'.

About the National Enquirer. I'm normally skeptical about it. Shoot me. I'm probably being picky by pointing out that what I said was the same Edwards issue also had an article about space people or something. Which it did.

Honestly, I don't find comfort knowing The Enquirer is always right about everything. Do you? Nightly Pod Checks? Does anyone know how much a preventive Indian Burial Ground survey costs? I used to think this was all bullshit. But after this stunning moment of credibility...we're obviously in for an unholy world of hurt, my brothers and sisters.

2:11 AM  
Anonymous elrond hubbard said...

t-man,

What are you dinking/smoking (or smoking and drinking)? Your late night benders will be your undoing.

You're right, the anarchists are not going to sack either Denver or Minneapolis; 157 people in Che T-shirts just aren't up to it. "Recreate '68" is a sour joke, scare tactics for the gullible. The whole world won't be watching; anyway, we can check out the action on the Spike Channel in a few months.

You'll look good in arugula drag, since you're already a vegetable. I just wonder what costume John Edwards will be wearing, perhaps the penitent husband.

Keep those tomatoes coming.

1:41 PM  
Anonymous troglaman said...

"You're right, the anarchists are not going to sack either Denver or Minneapolis; 157 people in Che T-shirts just aren't up to it. "Recreate '68" is a sour joke, scare tactics for the gullible. The whole world won't be watching; anyway, we can check out the action on the Spike Channel in a few months." elrond

Hear that, ray? Your friends have begun to eat their own. I want you to get up from your computer, grab your loved ones and your dog RIGHT NOW and leave. Now. That or be taken to the compound. Your choice.

OK, ray. Since you've stupidly decided to stay, let's boil it down.

If Riots: I'm a diabolical satanist eating live babies (with a delicate butter and basil sauce).

If No Riots: You're a troglamatic dumbass. Clear?

That's the wager. It has nothing to do with honor, or love of country, or love of Jesus or anything other than me being diabolically evil or you being troglamatically dumb. It's come down to this, ray. mano el mano. Just in case there are riots, don't pay any attention to the giant arugula.

12:35 AM  
Anonymous troglaman said...

"The left wing nose dive into the abyss of it's own making began in '68---and they loved it." elrond speaking Jungian constructions.

How old are you? Are you actually saying that the left got off on the RFK and MLK killings? Chicago? We "loved it"? And all this killing and brutality was of the left's "own making"?

You, my friend, are impaired. But it's a shocking revelation none the less. I'm especially interested in the "and they loved it" part. Maybe you could risk making as ass out of yourself and explain. Then move on to the "own making" bullshit and make a truly and fantastic ass out of yourself.

1:18 AM  
Anonymous elrond hubbard said...

t-square,

I was definitely around in the 60s and observed the Left and its antics.

Many Leftists (not ordinary Democrats) viewed the murders of MLK and RFK, the Chicago riots, the "Days of Rage" and campus disruptions are precursors to the coming revolution (they got Dick Nixon instead). The Left was never more than a loud minority and its tactics quickly degenerated into random violence, bombings, and collapse into splinter groups.

I was around when the Weathermen began their idiotic and self-defeating bombing campaign (shout out to William Ayers). I was living in NYC when they accidently blew up the Greenwich Village brownstone and I witnessed the subsequent hardhat riots. The Lefties were so surprised when working class men beat them up.

The Left was in "love" with the idea of redemptive violence during the 60s and early 70s; they went nowhere with that idea. That's why I admire the futility "Recreate '68". Idiots celebrating a gigantic failure by trying to repilcate it.

'68 was 40 years ago; no one under the age of 50 even remembers it. So all we have is the nostalgia of losers.

BTW, what was I doing in '68?
Someday, if you behave, I'll tell you.

Now get your arugula costume ready.

4:17 PM  
Anonymous troglaman said...

"BTW, what was I doing in '68?
Someday, if you behave, I'll tell you." elrond

Umm. Ok. I'll behave.

"The Left was in "love" with the idea of redemptive violence during the 60s and early 70s; they went nowhere with that idea." elrond

What the fuck are you talking about, elrond? Was there any "redemptive violence" collected at Kent State? Yup. You might want to compare that particular kill with all the victories won by the Berkley terrorists. After that, ask any old hippie if they're in love with violence. Go ahead. Dumbshit.

3:11 AM  
Anonymous elrond hubbard said...

Hey shithead,

I'm not talking about clueless hippies or feckless undergraduates, but you already know that.

Do a little googling. Start with "Kathy Boudin", "weather underground" or "Greenwich Village townhouse explosion".

4:45 PM  
Anonymous mandible claw said...

Just in case there are riots, don't pay any attention to the giant arugula.

Lol. T-man's sense of humour is wasted on a lib.

2:24 AM  
Anonymous troglaman said...

"T-man's sense of humour is wasted on a lib." mandible

I'm wasting it on you. Such irony.

2:58 AM  
Anonymous troglaman said...

"and they loved it" elrond

Still waiting for why we loved '68, elrond. You never did explain. I assume 'they' means 'moonbats', right? Why did the moonbats love '68? Let's hear it.

3:18 AM  
Anonymous elrond hubbard said...

T-man,

Why did the Left love '68? I suspect any reason I provide will be rejected by you. But '68 (and '69) represented the high tide of the Left in America. The country seemed to be falling apart and everything seemed to be going their way---Ghetto riots, campus uproars, the SDS, the Black Panthers, a seemingly endless war, Chicago, sex, dope and rock n' roll (O.K. so it wasn't all bad). The gates of Eden were about to open, the millenium was in sight---but it never happened, we got Nixon instead, and when he abolished the draft much of momentum went out of the Left. All that was left were self-destructive
dopes like the Weathermen and the SLA.

40 later all that's left is Baby Boomer nostalgia and goofy moonbats trying to "recreate '68".

The Left loves '68/9 for the same reason the Right loves Ronald Reagan, both represent a golden age that never occured.

So what was I doing in '68? Six months in Vietnam, six months on campus. Go figure.

2:08 PM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home