Tuesday, February 05, 2008

DUmmies Crybaby Over The Term "Democrat"


Who knew that the term "Democrat" was a slur? I sure didn't until the Democrats started crybabying about it. They are now demanding that we drop that "slur." Yeah, sure. So do pollsters now have to ask people if they are a Republican or a "Democratic." The good thing about using this "slur" is that it forces Democrats to drain away their energy getting outraged over this nonsense as you can see in this DUmmie THREAD titled, "WTF did I just see on MSNBC?" So let us now watch the DEMCRAT DUmmies get all outraged over semantics in Bolshevik Red while the commentary of your humble correspondent, hoping that the Show Me State will show me tonight that they WON'T be supporting McNasty, is in the [brackets]:


WTF did I just see on MSNBC?


[A rare view of Chris Matthews WITHOUT his lips firmly implanted on Obama's buttcheek?]


They had a header:

REPUBLICAN PRIMARIES

OK...fair enough...

then...

They had:

DEMOCRAT PRIMARIES


[HATE CRIME!!! Send the perpetrators to The Hague!!!]


WTF? I mean, WTF, man... I say...WTF?




[STOP THE WORLD! I WANT TO GET OFF!!!]


What a bunch of B.S. I saw the same thing on Sunday morning on..... the George Stephanopolis show!!! He certainly knows better, so WTF????

[Thanx for signalling that you are so outraged over the term "Democrat." I will now be sure to use it every chance I get.]


From this day forward, I propose we call Republicans, Pubicans.


[How about Repukes? Oh, you already use that term.]


Fatboy Timmy sat at the knee of Jack Welch, and was told if he played ball he'd be able to afford that overpriced Nantucket island home off Cape Cod on a news editor's/talking head's salary...


[Would that be a home located between the Nantucket homes of Tweety Matthews and the Mama of Mama T's Half Goy Toy?]


Who framed the idea that such uses of "Democrat" represent some sort of slur, anyway?


[Would that be Mr. Frame himself, George Lackoff, whose name rhymes with...]


I know it upsets a lot of Democrats but I don't really get what the big deal is.


[I don't know what the big deal is either but since it upsets so many Democrats, I use it as often as possible.]


Whatever the obscure origin of this issue...it's safe to say that the vast majority of Americans do not see a significant difference between Democrat and Democratic. So, my question is why do we keep taking the bait


[Because you're suckers?]


I honestly don't think the 99% of the population who aren't political junkies give a shit. Really, I don't think they pick it up as a slur, either consciously or subconsciously.


[It's sure riling up you DUmmies and that is good enough for me.]


Not one inch... I should think that liberals would have to agree that how the debate has been framed, the language used, and the low-level, subterranean, misuse of English, as well as The Big Lie is EXACTLY what has been so successful over the years.


[Not one inch... Let's get all La Pasionara over silly sematics. NO PASARAN!!!]


I correct people on this when I have the chance, but honestly I would think we as a party have more important things to get our shorts in a bunch over.


[SHHH!!! We want you to drain your Democrat energy over silly semantics. Or would that be "semants?"]


what's the beef? This stupendously unimportant "ic niggle" is asinine.


[Speaking of sematics, better not use that term around Al Sharpton. It sounds suspiciously racist. Or are you anti-semantic?]


It shows an utter lack of respect, and shows that they don't even consider you important enough to call you by your correct name..


[Okay, I won't call you a Democrat. I'll just call you by your correct name--- DUmmie.]

28 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

How bout Democraticans?

Or more appropriately "The American National Socialist Workers Party?"

10:07 AM  
Blogger Son Of The Godfather said...

Next step:

"Hi, are you a member of the Democrat party?"
"RAAAAACCCIIISSSST!"

I never liked the word "penguin"... I will correct people whenever they use it.

Jeeeeeez Looooeeeez, if someone ever tries to "correct" me by saying they preferred "Democratic" over "Democrat", they'll spend the next few months trying to "correct" dental problems.

10:26 AM  
Anonymous Anon 1:50 said...

"...This stupendously unimportant "ic niggle" is asinine..."

An "ic niggle"? Ohhhh! That's a great one for Webster!


Ic-niggle (ick-nig-gl) - N. 1.To worry, ad nauseum over the smallest trivialities. 2. To imagine trivialities are deliberate sleights against oneself or beliefs. 3. To become hysterical or paralyzed with rage over inconsequential matters.

Ic-niggler - N. 1.Practicioner of ic-niggling. SEE- feeb, nitwit, DUmmie, jerkoff, whiner, lickspittle, Democrat.

12:27 PM  
Anonymous Ray said...

How about the DemonCrapIck Party?

The Not In My Backyard! Party?

The Do As I Say And Not As I Do Party?

The I Hate America But I Can't Understand Why America Hates Me In Return Party?

Oh hell, call yourselves what you are: The I Need To Be In Constant Control Of Everything Party

"It shows an utter lack of respect, and shows that they don't even consider you important enough to call you by your correct name.. "

I'm sure Chimpy Bushitler and the rest of the Repukes would agree, ya fricken Hypocrite!

1:04 PM  
Anonymous dubya said...

ic-niggler

Truely something for wikipedia, anon 1:50!

ROFL!!

5:01 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

ray, that would be the DEMOCRAP party, not the DEMOCRAPIC party dammit!

5:03 PM  
Anonymous Skul said...

"From this day forward, I propose we call Republicans, Pubicans."

That's PubLicans you sorry nit-wit. Get it right.

"It shows an utter lack of respect, and shows that they don't even consider you important enough to call you by your correct name.."

Trust me, you wouldn't like the "correct" name you've so deservedly earned.

5:12 PM  
Blogger ntk said...

Pubicans. Isn't that something you catch if you have sex with a Democrat, uh, I mean, Democratic womyn?

3:10 AM  
Blogger Capitalist Infidel said...

Off topic but this should be fun, Obama wins the popular vote but Hillary wins more delegates on super Tuesday. That should make the DUmmies heads explode!

8:26 AM  
Anonymous Basilisk said...

Is it the one-syllable difference that's got his panties in a wad or something? Am I seeing the genesis of syllable-envy or what?

And I'd prefer to call them simply 'Rats', but that's a slur. To cute, furry rodents, that is.

9:39 AM  
Anonymous Ray said...

"ray, that would be the DEMOCRAP party, not the DEMOCRAPIC party dammit!"

Once again you drop the IC! Damn you! Damn you all to Hell!

11:13 AM  
Anonymous Ray said...

"Am I seeing the genesis of syllable-envy or what?"

I wouldn't be surprised. They're already the party of penis envy.

11:16 AM  
Anonymous Ray said...

"Off topic but this should be fun, Obama wins the popular vote but Hillary wins more delegates on super Tuesday. That should make the DUmmies heads explode!"

Hillary: Selected, not Elected! Heh!

11:20 AM  
Anonymous Britt said...

I just call them socialists. Because then I get to here the circus act style logic of how the redistribution of wealth, "free" healthcare and education, etc is not actually socialist, but something truly American, that all the Founding Fathers wanted, which is why our Constitution includes health care, education, and entertainment in the Bill of Rights.

You see...right here. Federalist Paper #9 and 3/4...it says "All Americans are entitled to a doctor, a teacher, and a puppy...also a pony. Abortions...those too..." Then there is a lot of blank space for liberal SCOTUS justices to write down new things the Constitution covers.

1:31 PM  
Anonymous dubya said...

DEMOCRAPIC Economic theory:

1. Punish those who produce (aka "Tax (steal from) the Rich").
2. Reward those who do not produce (aka "Share the Wealth").

Robin Hood was the most despicable, immoral character ever invented. -- Ragnar Danneskjold.

5:05 PM  
Anonymous troglaman said...

"Jeeeeeez Looooeeeez, if someone ever tries to "correct" me by saying they preferred "Democratic" over "Democrat", they'll spend the next few months trying to "correct" dental problems." son

Ha Ha Ha. There ye go. We are gettin ready for some teeth-smashin smack-down.

Couldn't put it any better meself. Like the "Democratics" have any teeth in the first place. Ha Ha Ha.

Thanks son. And I mean that respectfully.

12:40 AM  
Anonymous troglaman said...

"I just call them socialists. Because then I get to here the circus act style logic of how the redistribution of wealth, "free" healthcare and education, etc is not actually socialist, but something truly American, that all the Founding Fathers wanted, which is why our Constitution includes health care, education, and entertainment in the Bill of Rights." britt

Two sentences. An amazing feat of sweeping incoherence.

I've been wondering for a long time why this term "socialistic" is described like a creepy, flesh eating bacteria. It's not. It's a concept. So friggin scary.

Maybe this is the problem for you diehards. Maybe you're bigger pussys than you care to admit. Maybe you've become so terrified of little nations, with little armies, and little navies, and little air forces, and little concepts that you're willing to completely gut the country of every financial and military resource to conquer an imaginary foe.

Three sentences. Not bad.

Forget about China (who owns our debt and happens to be a nuclear power). Forget about Russia (who has recently said an attack on Iran would be considered an act of war and happens to be a nuclear power). They don't matter. No. It's the little guys you're scared of. Especially Iraq. I mean these Iraqis are some scary guys. They'll be planting an IED at your local shopping market any day now.

1:28 AM  
Anonymous Shambhala said...

Wow, T-man.

That was quite the non-sequitur

8:14 AM  
Anonymous dubya said...

I've been wondering for a long time why this term "socialistic" is described like a creepy, flesh eating bacteria. It's not.

How wrong you are. Socialism is the most immoral "concept" ever to pollute the mind of Man.

Tell me this t-man, when the whole "system" punishes the producers and rewards the non-producers, what is the only possible ultimate result? Non-producing looters, parasites, and mooches maybe?

What happens then when no wealth is produced to loot and "redistribute" and everyone is "needy?"

Socialism is indeed a flesh-eating disease. It causes humans to feed off each other.

10:03 AM  
Anonymous Ray said...

"I've been wondering for a long time why this term "socialistic" is described like a creepy, flesh eating bacteria. It's not. It's a concept. So friggin scary."

Socialism has only killed a 100 million people. Let's give it another chance.

11:48 AM  
Anonymous Ray said...

"Especially Iraq. I mean these Iraqis are some scary guys."

They sure were to the Iranians when they started a war that killed almost a million people. They also were to the Kuwaitis when they invaded Kuwait and rape, pillaged and burned. And let's not forget what they did to their own people; namely torture, maim, and kill anyone who opposed them.

Let's not forget about the mass graves they left behind. Let's not forget about the nerve gas attacks they made on Iran and in their own country, on their own citizens. Let's not forget the horror they spread throughout the entire region.

Yep, these were scary people and now most are dead or in hiding and they are no longer feared by millions. All thanks to America.

Also, let's not forget that Saddam, the leader of all that terror and destruction, was found hiding in a hole in the ground. So, who's the pussy now?

12:15 PM  
Anonymous Ray said...

Liberals: We never met a tyrant we didn't like.

12:21 PM  
Anonymous troglaman said...

"How wrong you are. Socialism is the most immoral "concept" ever to pollute the mind of Man." Dubya

The Veterans Administration is socialistic. Just so you know. Sooooooo scary. Wimp.

"They sure were to the Iranians when they started a war that killed almost a million people." ray

And you just love those Iranians, don't you, ray. I've noted you staunch support for Iranians before. Remember whose side we took then? Who Rumsfield visited? Who we gave money to? Probably not which makes your statement more than stupid.

4:07 AM  
Anonymous troglaman said...

"That was quite the non-sequitur" Sham

Was it? Aren't you afraid of all the Iraqi terrorists? All the Taliban and Al Qaeda lurking around Baghdad ready to board a plane the minute we remove the troops? Isn't that why we're fighting this stupid war? Better to fight them there than here?

Let's talk about a "non-sequitur", sham. It has something to do with irrelevance, doesn't it?

5:33 AM  
Anonymous dubya said...

The Veterans Administration is socialistic. -- t-man

The VA is society paying (in a piss-poor manner) a well-earned debt to those who have protected the society. I don't consider paying debts to be socialism.

10:57 AM  
Anonymous Ray said...

And you just love those Iranians, don't you, ray. I've noted you staunch support for Iranians before. Remember whose side we took then? Who Rumsfield visited? Who we gave money to? Probably not which makes your statement more than stupid."

What's that matter, don't like the truth being used against you? Don't like being reminded just how dangerous Saddam and his followers were? You know damn well that Iraq under Saddam was a living hell and his actions were threat to the entire region. Trying to claim that I support Iran is just a lame attempt to deflect the anger you feel at being proven wrong. Not only is it wrong, it's childish. Grow up, DUmmie.

Oh, and in case you forgotten; supporting Iraq in the Iran/Iraq war was a policy started by President Carter, not President Bush. Both Bush's went to war against Iraq, Bush Sr. in 1991 and Bush Jr. in 2003, remember?

12:42 PM  
Anonymous troglaman said...

"The VA is society paying (in a piss-poor manner) a well-earned debt to those who have protected the society." dubya

Yes. When society pays for something, it's socialistic. I challenge you to provide a different definition. It's nice to see you're aware of the fact its "piss-poor". And it's nice to see that you appreciate they're need is "well earned". It is.

So you're now faced with a dilemma. If society pays for their well earned sacrifices, then we've become socialistic. If society doesn't...what's that make us, dubya? Can't have it both ways.

2:33 AM  
Anonymous troglaman said...

And you just love those Iranians, don't you, ray. I've noted you staunch support for Iranians before. Remember whose side we took then? Who Rumsfield visited? Who we gave money to? Probably not which makes your statement more than stupid." trog

"What's that matter?...Don't like being reminded just how dangerous Saddam and his followers were?" ray

That's the thing, Ray, you idiot. Saddam and his followers were, and are not, dangerous. They don't have WMD's. They don't have ballistic missiles. They don't have subs. They don't have an airforce. They don't have shit. You advocate throwing our entire military at ghosts. You're a dumb...sorry. You're an extremely intelligent person arguing for a position that makes no sense to anyone but you. Fuck it. You're a dumbass.

2:49 AM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home