VIDEO: Democrats Tear Each Other Apart In SC Debate
WOW! Last night's Democrat debate in South Carolina was the most fascinating such event since Ronald Reagan told Jimmy Carter "There you go again," in 1980. However, in stark contrast to the uplifting nature of the Gipper, ALL of the candidates last night came off poorly. The first half of the video above shows Hillary and Obama in a bigtime catfight. Barack calls Hillary a corporate lawyer who sat on the board of directors of Wal-Mart. Later Hillary gets roundly booed when she brings up Obama's association with a "slumlord." In the second half of this video, John Edwards goes into an extreme pander routine. Oh, no need to DUFU the DUmmies in this edition since anything they have said is anti-climatic to the firestorm of last night's debate. So sit back and enjoy the dramatic action of Democrats tearing Democrats apart.
posted by PJ-Comix at 9:05 AM
6 Comments:
Eduhwards is efinitely a pretty, pandering populist who hasn't a clue about moneylending, taxation, or healthcare.
http://www.theobjectivestandard.com/issues/2007-fall/morality-of-moneylending.asp
http://www.theobjectivestandard.com/issues/2007-winter/moral-vs-universal-health-care.asp
Please, PLEASE let Hillary be the nominee!
Edwards actually came across as the best debtor in this clip even though he panders to the racists who continually claim that "whity be keepen me down!". He's right about the two other candidates sniping at each other. It's not helping them at all, but, damn, it sure is FUn to watch!.
He's wrong about the banks "targeting poor people" with sub prime loans. Hay Edwards (and trolls), "poor" people are "targeted" for sub prime loans because sub-prime loans are DESIGNED to give credit to those who can not otherwise get a loan, like the lower income earners. But it's a loan, not a gift. You have to pay them back. It's not the fault of the lender if people can't make the payments they promised to make when they signed the contract and received the loan, that's the fault of the people who agreed to a loan and then, for whatever reason, fail to make the payments. People should not make promises they can not keep, even if they're "poor". If you can't afford to make the payments, don't get the damn loans. How hard is that to figure out?
Also, Edwards said that all three candidates agree that Social Security needs to be fixed and that all three candidates have stated that they will not "privatize" or raise taxes or reduce benefits. At least one of those things has to occur if Social Security is to be fixed. If they are not going to actually change anything, just how the hell are they going to fix it? Of course, we all know he lied because he stated that he'll raise the SSI caps which will raise the taxes collected from ANYONE making over $90,000.00 a year. It not just the "rich" who will find they have to pay more in taxes, just about everyone else will too. You know, like the upper and middle income earners who will be forced to pay more and more in taxes in order for John to say he "fixed" SSI. Robbing Peter to pay Paul is not a fix, it's a scam.
Rowrrr! ffft ffft!
Edwards actually came across as the best debtor in this clip...
Lil slip there or literally a debtor?
i.e., the gubmint should spend spend spend and become the best debtor?
Robbing Peter to pay Paul is not a fix, it's a scam.
There you go again, exposing the lunacy of socialists, parasites, looters, and mooches (not to mention throwing aversion on Robin Hood, the original "populist"). SHHH! The "po folk" might understand you!
Post a Comment
<< Home