DUmmies pooh-pooh Democrat vote fraud

AND OFTEN

Hypocrisy, thy name is DUmmie. We have seen this, and said this, many times over the years. The DUmmie DUbble standard is always in effect.

And so it is when it comes to vote(r) fraud. Actually, the DUmmies prefer to use the term "election fraud," since "vote(r) fraud" implies that it is done by individual voters (i.e., Democrats), whereas "election fraud" is done by unseen evil powers manipulating electronic voting machines (i.e., Diebold) whenever a Democrat loses. The DUmmies contend, on the basis of no evidence whatsoever, that both the 2000 and 2004 elections were stolen by evil Republicans. Now, however, when there IS abundant evidence of massive "irregularities" in predominately Democrat precincts in cities like Philadelphia, Cleveland, Miami, Richmond--possibly tipping the balance in key states like Florida, Virginia, and Ohio--now the DUmmies cannot even IMAGINE the possibility of fraud, and they ridicule Republicans for even raising the question! No investigation necessary, nosiree!

We see the DUmmie DUbble Standard on display here in this THREAD, "Was this election stolen by massive Democrat vote fraud?" and in this THREAD, "In 59 Philadelphia voting wards, Mitt Romney got zero votes."

So let us now go to the land where they all take the Hypocritic Oath, DUmmieland, in Late Red Round One Red, while the commentary of your humble guest correspondent, Charles Henrickson, born and raised in the city of Chicago and thus familiar with Democrat deviocracy, is in the [brackets]:

Was this election stolen by massive Democrat vote fraud?

[Very posssibly. It was a squeaker of an election, a few hundred thousand votes in a few key states making the difference. And there are these reports out there of questionable results in a number of cities. And since you DUers, being the good citizens that you are, who yourselves have crusaded against election fraud in the past--why, I'm sure you'll be eager to have these troubling irregularities looked into and thoroughly investigated, to make sure that everything was done on the up-and-up and that Our President won fair and square.]

Um, no. Next question.

["Um, no"?? "UM, NO"??? That's it?? Don't you want this thing investigated, to remove all doubt? This IS DUmmieland, isn't it, where you are all about fair elections??]

Yes, people voted.

[Yes, even dead people. This is true democracy. Why should the non-breathing be disenfranchised?]

 

I am sure some people think that when women and minorities vote, it is voter fraud.

[It is, if they vote multiple times in multiple locations under multiple names. You know, the Obama campaign's incredible emphasis on "early voting," which seemed obsessive at the time, now makes a lot more sense.]

How about the Dems and the R's unite to eliminate nearly all chances of voter fraud?

[OK, I agree. First of all, we should insist on every voter producing a valid photo ID. Then we should limit or eliminate "early voting," which is an open invitation for mischief. Third, we should insist on there being plenty of Democrat election judges and poll-watchers present in heavily Republican precincts, as well as plenty of Republican election judges and poll-watchers present in heavily Democrat precincts. They should be warmly welcomed and protected in these potentially hostile locations, don't you agree? Yes, these are all GREAT ideas to insure fair elections, and so I'm SURE you will agree!]

And how about some real steel baretrap punishments for those caught engaging in any type of election or voter fraud?!

[BEWEAR THE BARETRAP!]

In addition to while were at it, we can straighten out this voter ID big pile of Bullsh*t that seems to become the latest and greatest GOP line of tragic comedy. Where's the evidence? Both sides should have plenty of evidence to prove that requiring everyone to have ID is justified rather than a complete waste of time.

[Well, let's see. . . . We require a photo ID to get on an airplane, to cash a check, to buy Sudafed, to get into an Obama rally. . . . Yet a simple little thing like this is too much to ask to make sure a voter is who he says he is??]

DU Rec for utter insanity.

[DUFU Rec for DUmmie hypocrisy.]

What a dumb question.

[It's only a dumb question when Republicans ask it. Otherwise, "election fraud" is an old DUmmie standby.]

And pure projection. . . .

[For, as we all know, only Rethuglicans can commit election fraud.]

 

In 59 Philadelphia voting wards, Mitt Romney got zero votes. . . .

[And Zero got more votes than voters.]

In 59 Philadelphia voting wards, Mitt Romney got zero votes. . . .

[Philadelphia, Philadelphia. . . . Now why does that name ring a bell? Oh, that's right! There was that report last week, on election day--all those Republican election watchers being forcibly ejected from all those Philadelphia polling places. You know, that's kind of a strange coincidence. I wonder if there's any connec-- Naaah!!]

It's Always Sunny in Philadephia.

[Chance of Democrat votes:  130%]

Philadelphia freedom in the city of brother love.

[The bruthas are free to do whatever they want.]

My admiration for the People of Philadelphia just went up exponentially.

[As did Obama's votes.]

Philly is ALL BLUE!

[This post courtesy of the ironically named Blue State Bandit.]

I'm sure these were black wards, but it's still hard to believe, not one vote? I know it's possible, but is it believable?

[QUIET! How DARE you suggest that even ONE black person might ever vote for an evil Rethuglican!!]

One place, there were two R committeepeople but only one Romney vote. . . .

[Rethuglicans should only get a half-vote anyway. If that.]

Note to self: find realtor in Philadelphia.

[Good luck! But even if you don't survive until 2016, don't worry. You'll still be able to vote in the next election.]

First impression is that there's something wrong. . . .

[STOP! YOU MUST NOT QUESTION DEMOCRAT VICTORIES! ONLY RETHUGLICAN!]